Tv Drama Background To The Exam
View more presentations from hammonda.
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Friday, 8 January 2010
Monday, 4 January 2010
Genre Evaluation
D.I.Y. Generic analysis
The following questions are offered as basic guidelines for students analysing their coursework in relation to genre. This is a potential question in Section B of your summer examination. Note that an analysis of a text which is framed exclusively in terms of genre may be of limited usefulness. Generic analysis can also, of course, involve studying the genre more broadly. This is something we simply don't have time to do in class so you will need to spend time outside of class doing this (although you will hopefully have done lots of this when planning your production).- General
- In what context did you encounter it? (web, film, TV etc)
- What influence do you think this context might have had on your interpretation of the text?
- To what genre did you initially assign the text?
- What is your experience of this genre?
- What subject matter and basic themes is the text concerned with?
- How typical of the genre is this text in terms of content?
- What expectations do you have about texts in this genre?
- Have you found any formal generic labels for this particular text (where)?
- What generic labels have others given the same text?
- Which conventions of the genre do you recognize in the text?
- To what extent does this text stretch the conventions of its genre?
- Where and why does the text depart from the conventions of the genre?
- Which conventions seem more like those of a different genre (and which genre(s))?
- What familiar motifs or images are used?
- Which of the formal/stylistic techniques employed are typical/untypical of the genre?
- What institutional constraints are reflected in the form of the text?
- What relationship to 'reality' does the text lay claim to?
- Whose realities does it reflect?
- What purposes does the genre serve?
- In what ways are these purposes embodied in the text?
- To what extent did your purposes match these when you engaged with the text?
- What ideological assumptions and values seem to be embedded in the text?
- What pleasures does this genre offer to you personally?
- What pleasures does the text appeal to (and how typical of the genre is this)?
- Did you feel 'critical or accepting, resisting or validating, casual or concentrated, apathetic or motivated' (and why)?
- Which elements of the text seemed salient because of your knowledge of the genre?
- What predictions about events did your generic identification of the text lead to (and to what extent did these prove accurate)?
- What inferences about people and their motivations did your genre identification give rise to (and how far were these confirmed)?
- How and why did your interpretation of the text differ from the interpretation of the same text by other people?
- Mode of address
- What sort of audience was your text aimed at (and how typical was this of the genre)?
- How does the text address your classmates?
- What sort of person does it assume they are?
- What assumptions have you made about their class, age, gender and ethnicity?
- What interests does it assume they have?
- What relevance does the text actually have for you?
- What knowledge does it take for granted?
- To what extent do you resemble the 'ideal reader' that the text seeks to position you as?
- Are there any notable shifts in the text's mode of address (and if so, what do they involve)?
- What responses does the text seem to expect from your audience?
- How open to negotiation is their response (are they invited, instructed or coerced to respond in particular ways)?
- Is there any penalty for not responding in the expected ways (think in terms of enjoyment for the audience or consequences for the institution)?
- To what extent did people find themselves 'reading against the grain' of the text and the genre?
- Which attempts to position your audience in this text do they accept, reject or seek to negotiate (and why)?
- How closely aligned is the way in which the text addresses you with the way in which the genre positions you (Kress 1988, 107)?
- Relationship to other texts
- What intertextual references are there in the text you have created (and to what other texts)?
- Generically, which other texts does the text you created resemble most closely?
- What key features are shared by these texts?
- What major differences do you notice between them?
Evaluation Questions
In the evaluation the following questions must be answered:
1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
E.g. Here you need to analyse at least 9 key shots from your main task and write about: generic conventions you’ve applied or subverted, your use of camera work, lighting, music, mise en scene, intertextuality, shots which show you’ve watched similar media texts. Pick key features from your ancillary tasks and do the same.
2. How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
E.g. Here you should provide background information to your products detailing what kind of image you hoped to create and your main aims behind creating the campaign. You should mention: research, narrative, use of colour, text, font, images, sound and how they link. Evaluate your pieces by considering what worked well and what you’d change if you could.
3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
E.g. Initial feedback you received from peers, teachers and social networking sites and what you did about it
4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
List all of the equipment you used and how it helped you – what would you have had to do if you didn’t have access to it? Include screengrabs of the programmes you used.
You must answer all of the questions in as much detail as possible.
You should include a variety of different ways to answer your questions as you will be assessed on your presentation e.g. screengrabs, scribd, director’s commentary, JPEG files, slideshare etc
see http://musicvideomattleonowicz.blogspot.com/ for examples of these ways
Mark scheme:
Level 1 0–7 marks
There is minimal understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is minimal understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is minimal understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is minimal understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is minimal skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is minimal ability to communicate.
There is minimal use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Level 2 8–11 marks
There is basic understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is basic understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is basic understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is basic understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is basic skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is basic ability to communicate.
There is basic use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Level 3 12–15 marks
There is proficient understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is proficient understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is proficient understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is proficient understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is proficient skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is proficient ability to communicate.
There is proficient use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Level 4 16–20 marks
There is excellent understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is excellent understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is excellent understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is excellent understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is excellent skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is excellent ability to communicate.
There is excellent use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
E.g. Here you need to analyse at least 9 key shots from your main task and write about: generic conventions you’ve applied or subverted, your use of camera work, lighting, music, mise en scene, intertextuality, shots which show you’ve watched similar media texts. Pick key features from your ancillary tasks and do the same.
2. How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
E.g. Here you should provide background information to your products detailing what kind of image you hoped to create and your main aims behind creating the campaign. You should mention: research, narrative, use of colour, text, font, images, sound and how they link. Evaluate your pieces by considering what worked well and what you’d change if you could.
3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
E.g. Initial feedback you received from peers, teachers and social networking sites and what you did about it
4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
List all of the equipment you used and how it helped you – what would you have had to do if you didn’t have access to it? Include screengrabs of the programmes you used.
You must answer all of the questions in as much detail as possible.
You should include a variety of different ways to answer your questions as you will be assessed on your presentation e.g. screengrabs, scribd, director’s commentary, JPEG files, slideshare etc
see http://musicvideomattleonowicz.blogspot.com/ for examples of these ways
Mark scheme:
Level 1 0–7 marks
There is minimal understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is minimal understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is minimal understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is minimal understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is minimal skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is minimal ability to communicate.
There is minimal use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Level 2 8–11 marks
There is basic understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is basic understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is basic understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is basic understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is basic skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is basic ability to communicate.
There is basic use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Level 3 12–15 marks
There is proficient understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is proficient understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is proficient understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is proficient understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is proficient skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is proficient ability to communicate.
There is proficient use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Level 4 16–20 marks
There is excellent understanding of the forms and conventions used in the productions.
There is excellent understanding of the role and use of new media in various stages of the production.
There is excellent understanding of the combination of main product and ancillary texts.
There is excellent understanding of the significance of audience feedback.
There is excellent skill in choice of form in which to present the evaluation.
There is excellent ability to communicate.
There is excellent use of digital technology or ICT in the evaluation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)